The pressure builds....
Of the 5 principles set out in this letter, I find the 4th principle the most interesting:
"In addition to the use of credits to support the reduction of their GHG footprint, companies should continue to be strongly encouraged to use a beyond value chain mitigation (BVCM) approach whereby climate leaders can address any emissions that remain each year after they have met their annual progress towards net-zero."
As I raised back in April when the SBTi Board released their announcement re use of carbon credits to meet scope 3 GHG targets, if there is to be some "compromise" in order for standard setters like SBTi, VCMI and IC-VCM to have a *common* "end-to-end integrity framework" for carbon markets, then the quid pro quo of allowing the use of high-quality carbon credits in scope 3 abatement should be greater credibility given to BVCM action (see my 10th April post).
I would go further than what is proposed in the 4th principle. The guardrails to be developed must include:
- Companies wishing to use high-quality carbon credits to meet scope 3 targets should be *required* to take BVCM action (not just "strongly encouraged")
- That BVCM action should explicitly include making high-quality Contribution Claims
- The VCMI, based on the excellent guidance Science Based Targets initiative and Gold Standard have already developed, should recognise a new type of Contribution Claim, in addition to their existing Platinum, Gold and Silver claims, which goes beyond carbon credits
- If companies use instruments other than carbon credits for abatement purposes on scope 3 emissions, then they should be required to also use such instruments for BVCM action on unabated scope 1 and 2 emissions
Nature-based carbon credits are a powerful tool to achieve net-zero emissions, but time is of the essence. We are joining forces with American Forest Foundation, Conservation International, Environmental Defense Fund, Fauna & Flora , and The Nature Conservancy to call on Science Based Targets initiative to include 5 key guardrails in its review of how carbon credits are used for Scope 3 emissions abatement.
🌿 Our letter stresses how, with proper science- and evidence-based guardrails, carbon credits will speed, not hinder, climate progress at a global scale. https://bit.ly/3xu8kSx
WCS Signs Joint Letter to the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) Supporting the Use of High-Quality Carbon Credits in Scope 3 Emissions Abatement
newsroom.wcs.org
Most informative.