Medicina | Special Issue : General and Regional Anesthesia for Perioperative Analgesia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
3.3
2.4
Journals
Medicina
Special Issues
General and Regional Anesthesia for Perioperative Analgesia
share announcement

General and Regional Anesthesia for Perioperative Analgesia

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Intensive Care/ Anesthesiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 October 2024 | Viewed by 4039

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Henry Liu

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Suite 680 Dulles, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Interests: blood management; hemodynamic monitoring; perioperative management
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The Medicina’s special issue “General and Regional Anesthesia for Perioperative Analgesia” will focus on the following topics to cover all aspects of perioperative analgesia:

  • Multimodal perioperative analgesia
  • What is new in neuraxial analgesia for postoperative pain management
  • Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral block
  • Ultrasound-guided Parasternal block
  • Ultrasound-guided TAP block
  • Ultrasound-guided Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia (Adhikary)
  • Non-neuraxial regional technique for post-cesarean section analgesia (Sangkum)
  • PEC block
  • Ultrasound-guided Lumbar plexus nerve blocks
  • Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (Verbeek)
  • New opioid analgesics
  • New non-opioid analgesics

This special issue will provide a comprehensive coverage of all areas related to perioperative analgesia, especially those newer ultrasound-guided nerve blocks.

Dr. Henry Liu
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • opioid-sparing
  • ERAS
  • hemodynamic monitoring
  • fluid therapy
  • multimodal analgesia
  • novel anesthetic techniques
  • novel anesthetic agents
  • multimodal analgesia
  • controversies in fluid therapy
  • new techniques/equipment in airway management
  • DINE procedure and its anesthetic management
  • perioperative anticoagulation
  • postoperative neurocognitive decline

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

10 pages, 477 KiB  
Article
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Reduces Workloads in Labor Analgesia: A Single Center’s Experience
by Chia-Hung Ou and Wei-Ting Chen
Medicina 2024, 60(6), 993; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060993 - 17 Jun 2024
Viewed by 569
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Labor epidural analgesia can be maintained through programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB), continuous epidural infusion (CEI), or patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Our department changed from CEI+PCEA to PIEB+PCEA as the maintenance method. The higher hourly dose setting in the current [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Labor epidural analgesia can be maintained through programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB), continuous epidural infusion (CEI), or patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Our department changed from CEI+PCEA to PIEB+PCEA as the maintenance method. The higher hourly dose setting in the current regimen brought to our concern that side effects would increase with proportional staff workloads. This study aimed to investigate the validity of our proposal that PIEB+PCEA may function as a feasible tool in reducing the amount of work in the obstetrics anesthesia units. Materials and methods: This 2-year retrospective review included parturients with vaginal deliveries under epidural analgesia. We compared the staff burden before and after the switch from CEI (6 mL/h, PCEA 6 mL lockout 15 min, group A) to PIEB (8 mL/h, PCEA 8 mL lockout 10 min, group B). The primary outcome was the difference of proportion of parturients requiring unscheduled visits between groups. Side effects and labor and neonatal outcomes were compared. Results: Of the 694 parturients analyzed, the proportion of those requiring unscheduled visits were significantly reduced in group B (20.8% vs. 27.7%, chi-square test, p = 0.033). The multivariate logistic regression showed that PIEB was associated with fewer unscheduled visits than CEI (OR = 0.53, 95% CI [0.36–0.80], p < 0.01). Group B exhibited a significantly lower incidence of asymmetric blockade, as well as motor blockade. In nulliparous subjects, obstetric anal sphincter injury occurred less frequently when PIEB+PCEA was used. Significantly more multiparous women experienced vacuum extraction delivery in group B than in group A, and they had a longer second stage of labor. Conclusions: The PIEB+PCEA protocol in our study reduced workloads in labor epidural analgesia as compared to CEI+PCEA, despite that a higher dose of analgesics was administered. Future studies are warranted to investigate the effect of manipulating the PIEB settings on the labor outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia for Perioperative Analgesia)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

12 pages, 1321 KiB  
Review
Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Cesarean Delivery Analgesia: A Narrative Review
by Lisa Sangkum, Amornrat Tangjitbampenbun, Theerawat Chalacheewa, Kristin Brennan and Henry Liu
Medicina 2023, 59(11), 1951; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59111951 - 4 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3124
Abstract
Effective postoperative analgesia using multimodal approach improves maternal and neonatal outcomes after cesarean delivery. The use of neuraxial approach (local anesthetic and opioids) and intravenous adjunctive drugs, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen, currently represents the standard regimen for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. [...] Read more.
Effective postoperative analgesia using multimodal approach improves maternal and neonatal outcomes after cesarean delivery. The use of neuraxial approach (local anesthetic and opioids) and intravenous adjunctive drugs, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen, currently represents the standard regimen for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Peripheral nerve blocks may be considered in patients who are unable to receive neuraxial techniques; these blocks may also be used as a rescue technique in selected patients. This review discusses the relevant anatomy, current evidence, and advantages and disadvantages of the various peripheral nerve block techniques. Further research is warranted to compare the analgesic efficacy of these techniques, especially newer blocks (e.g., quadratus lumborum blocks and erector spinae plane blocks). Moreover, future studies should determine the safety profile of these blocks (e.g., fascial plane blocks) in the obstetric population because of its increased susceptibility to local anesthetic toxicity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue General and Regional Anesthesia for Perioperative Analgesia)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

---

Figure 3

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop